Skill games have been on the rise in Pennsylvania, sparking debates about regulation and taxation. A recent court decision in favor of skill games has given the industry a boost, paving the way for regulation. Although some casino operators have expressed concerns about the impact of skill games on their revenue, others have seen an increase in revenue thanks to sports wagering and online gambling.
Mike Barley, the chief of public relations for Pace-O-Matic, a manufacturer of skill games, criticized casino operators for their opposition to skill games. He argued that skill games provide much-needed supplemental revenue for small businesses and urged casino operators to change their perspective on the industry.
The court’s decision has been hailed as a victory for skill games in Pennsylvania, with supporters hoping for effective regulation. Sen. Gene Yaw has proposed a bill for the taxation and regulation of skill games, with estimates suggesting it could generate $300 million in revenue for the state in the first year.
However, casino operators continue to oppose such regulations, with Barley accusing them of hindering the process. He claimed that big casino operators are standing in the way of the regulation of skill games and called for lawmakers to take action.
Overall, the debate around the regulation and taxation of skill games in Pennsylvania continues, with both supporters and opponents voicing their concerns and hopes for the industry’s future.